Opinion Articles
2016/17
|
High-Tech & Technology -
DUN’S
100
23
Opinion Article
P
rofessionals are always in pursuit of quick,
reliable, and cost efficient patent pros-
ecution, while taking into account global
implications. Global patents as such are not yet
available, but small steps toward global prosecu-
tion have been gradually introduced in leading juris-
dictions. Newprocedural routes were developed by
the Israel Patent Authority (ILPA) in the last couple
of years, accruing unique benefits to Israeli appli-
cants, whichmay be available to foreign applicants
aswell. The Israeli channel can substantially reduce
risks
before
the filing of an international PCT ap-
plication or other national patent applications, by
taking advantage of an accelerated examination
of an Israeli priority application conducted by the
ILPA, in complete confidentiality. Subsequent filing
of a PCT application, while selecting the ILPA as the
InternationalSearching Authority (ISA), may further
reduce the riskof redundant complications that may
be encountered during further prosecution.
First Stage: File National Application with Accel-
erated Examination. Optional Full Prosecution
Despite privately conducted patentability searches,
the actual patentability prospects remain uncer-
tain when filing a new patent application, and ap-
plicants typically encounter newly cited prior-art
upon examination. Therefore, there is an inherent
risk associated with patent filings, as applicants
cannot be guaranteed of eventually obtaining a
valid patent. If the first, i.e., “priority”, application
is filed in Israel, then an accelerated examination
may be requested. Israeli and Foreign applicants or
inventors, including U.S. inventors who obtained a
foreign filing license, can file their first application
in Israel following a routine request. A Search Re-
port and an Office Action (OA) is normally furnished
within 3-4 months. If prosecution is continued, a
second OA and sometimes even a third OA will be
issued before the lapse of the first year. The Israeli
application may be further prosecuted until grant,
but prosecution is optional as the application may
be abandoned or withdrawn and yet still be utilized
as a priority application. The Israeli jurisdiction is
not abandoned because a further national phase
applicationmay be filed later in Israel in pursuance
of the PCT application.
Second Stage: File International (PCT)
Application
A PCT application claiming priority from the Israeli
application is filed within one year. Israeli appli-
cants and inventors may file the PCT application
designating the ILPA as the ISA. Other applicants
and inventors (e.g., U.S. nationals) can file the ap-
plication with the USPTO as the Receiving Office
but request the ILPA to act as the ISA pursuant to a
USPTO pilot program.
The PCT application can include new subject matter
as well as implementation of amendments based
on lessons learned from the initial search and pros-
ecution of the Israeli priority application, thereby
optimally positioning the PCT application for a
favorable examination. Such an augmented PCT
application is generallymuchmoremature than an
application for which the initial examination occurs
at the PCT international phase.
Usually, the same Examiner team will typically
examine the corresponding PCT application, with
which they will be familiar from the first filing in Isra-
el, while conducting a further search in its capacity
as the ISA, but naturally will take into account their
previous findings. The ILPA encourages such a chain
of events by launching a “PCT-Direct” pilot program
with specifically reduced examination fees, and the
applicant is invited to file comments addressing
objections raised in the Israeli examination. Fol-
lowing the aforementioned approach significantly
increases the likelihood that the patent application
will be first publishedwith a favorable International
Search Report andWrittenOpinion (ISR/WO), which
represents the initial publication worldwide.
What should be done with the Israeli Priority ap-
plication at the second stage? Four options:
1. Complete prosecution and receive an Israeli pat-
ent. The publication and eventual grant of an Israeli
patent may take place before the PCT process yields
any results.
2. Delay prosecution to allow amending the Israeli
application to conform to the PCT application. The
publication and eventual grant of an Israeli Patent
may be delayed until the lapse of 18 months from
the priority filing date to allow addressing poten-
tial new findings resulting from the PCT search and
examination process.
3. Abandon the Israeli application, andmerely use it
as a priority application (for the PCT application).
A further Israeli National Phase application can be
filed later based on the PCT application linked to
the same chain, for the purpose of prosecuting dif-
ferent claims, including new subject matter that
was added to the PCT application, or divisional
inventions.
4. Abandon both the Israeli and PCT applications.
If the search or examination findings are such that
the patentability prospects appear hopeless, then
one can save additional future costs that would
otherwise be incurred by continuing with the a full
PCT process. This may be conducted in total confi-
dentiality before publication.
Third Stage: Patent Prosecution Highways -
PCT-PPH or GPPH for National Phase
Under the PCT-PPH or Global-PPH (GPPH) programs,
an applicant can “fast track” the examination of a
national phase application in certain jurisdictions
based on an indication by another patent office
of at least one allowable claim in a corresponding
application.
•
PCT-PPH -
The applicant may request accelerated
examination in selected national phase jurisdiction
based on the following PCT work products: (1) a
positive International Search Report and Written
Opinion (ISR/WO); or (2) a favorable International
Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP), if a De-
mand was filed therefor, following an unfavorable
ISR/WO. Israel has several agreements with other
countries in the PCT-PPH program guaranteeing
such accelerated examination, including
U.S
,
Eu-
rope
(EPO)
,
China
,
Japan
,
Korea
, and
Finland
.
•
GPPH -
The offices involved with the GPPH are
in
USA
,
Japan
,
Korea
,
Russia
,
Canada
,
Australia
,
Israel
,
Singapore
,
and several
European offices.
The GPPH pilot allows patent applicants to request
accelerated examination at any of the offices in-
volved, if at least one claim in the application has
been found to be allowable by another patent office
involved. If the Israeli prosecution is successfully
completed with an allowance, then one can file
GPPH for national phase regardless of the opinions
issued in the PCT work products.
In summary:
The Israeli channel reduces patentability “gam-
bling” risks, allowing the application to mature, or
to be “buried”, before publication, under confiden-
tiality, at an early stage, whereby applicants can be
well informed and attain a greater understanding of
what to expect before the filing of an international
PCT or other national applications, and obtain early
grants in leading jurisdictions, with substantially
reduced prosecution costs.
International Patent Prosecution through the
Israeli Channel
By Zohar Eliezri, Adv. & Patent Attorney
Adv. Zohar Eliezri, Owner & CEO, Eliezri Intellectual Property, Patent Attorneys & Law Offices